High Court Sides with Digital e-way bill
The Allahabad High Court ruled that the physical printout of an
e-way bill is not necessary for a transporter to present if the
electronic version of the document has been stored on a mobile phone or
other device. In this case, the vehicle was detained and a seizure order
was passed even though the e-way bill had been downloaded the day
before the seizure order was passed. Here the e-way bill was issued on
26 March 2018 and the seizure order was issued on 27 March 2018.
Furthermore, there was a valid GST invoice with the cargo – based on
these grounds the court quashed the seizure order.
While detention and seizure of goods is permitted under Sections 129
and 130 of the UPGST Act – the recent Circular 41/2018 from the CBEC
establishes procedures and provides guidance to officers. When the
inspection occurs if the documents are verified and no discrepancies are
found on the face and an de-way bill number is made available or in a
print out or SMS then the detention is over and the goods are free to
move.
In this case, the e-way bill number and the e-way bill in a form was
available and presented so the goods should have been allowed to
continue without any further obstruction.
GST Rule 138B(1) which states the officer is allowed to intercept a
conveyance to verify the e-way bill in physical or electronic form.
There is no requirement to have both a physical and electronic copy of
an e-way bill with a transporter. The rules do require the e-way bill to
be issued before the movement begins – the case could have had a
different outcome if the e-way bill had been issued after the seizure
order had been made.
The decision is one of the first after the introduction of the e-way
bill and it reinforces the idea that the information being submitted
through the correct portal and available rather than being physically
present is important. This is an important step toward the reduction in
dependency on paper and other physical media. These physical media can
be easily forged or lost. Rather than relying on indicia like a stamp or
a seal – the court has sided with a novel approach which combines
process, accuracy and availability.

Comments
Post a Comment